5 years since the 2011 disaster, and mothers still agonized by anxieties and more

Original Japanese written by  staffer
The English below written and arranged by Heeday, based on the original Japanese
The English edited by Rev. Dr. Henry French, ELCA

Article from the February 23rd, 2016 edition of the Asahi Shimbun newspaper

▼Click the image to read an English summary of the Japanese article.

Asahi Shimbun Almost five years have passed since the meltdown began at TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi. The natural decay of radioactive substances and the decontamination work have brought the radiation level down to some extent. The meltdown, however, is still seriously affecting the living and lifestyles of many people in Fukushima.
Asahi Shimbun
Almost five years have passed since the meltdown began at TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi. The natural decay of radioactive substances and the decontamination work have brought the radiation level down to some extent. The meltdown, however, is still seriously affecting the living and lifestyles of many people in Fukushima.

Almost five years have passed —
Today, here in Fukushima, we see more parents and children than before at supermarkets buying food produced in Fukushima. We see children’s clothing swinging and drying beside windows. (Hanging washed clothes to dry them is a common practice in Japan.) Still, some 70,000 people, by government order, are living as refugees. For many of them, life is simply not the same since the meltdown. Moreover, troubling issues experienced by the citizens of Fukushima never seem to be resolved.

A mother in agony
Such an issue that causes real agony for a 40-year-old mother, who moved with her husband and child into Koriyama from a coastal region of Fukushima shortly after the meltdown began, has to do with school lunches. Her 11-year-old daughter, a fifth grader, has to take her packed lunch out of her school bag, while some of her class mates serve other children the school provided meal (a common practice at many elementary schools in Japan). Even though the ingredients used in the meals provided by the schools, if they are produced in Fukushima, have passed radioactivity inspections, her mother is deeply worried over the daughter’s health and prepares a packed lunch for her every day.

Issues in the daughter’s class
The daughter has learned to eat the lunch prepared by her mother, saying “I don’t mind having a lunch different from that of my classmates sitting next to me.” Still, she knows that some of her classmates are whispering among themselves: “Is she emotionally sick, avoiding the school meal?” Her classmates used to be good friends, but they will not speak to her now. Says her mother, “Someday, my daughter might fall sick. I am overwhelmed by fear.”

One staffer at Fukushima Prefecture’s board of education has said, “Some, not many, school children carry their packed lunch to school. Some kids wear a mask when they run at a school athletic festival. Different people have different ideas about radiation, and we cannot push our beliefs onto them.”

 

Article from the February 21st, 2016 edition of the Fukushima Minpo newspaper
▼Click the image to read an English summary of the Japanese article.

Fukushima Minpo In the School Year 2015 (April 2015 through March 2016, in Japan), 27.3% of Fukushima’s school meal ingredients were produced in Fukushima, up from the year before by 5.4%. This is possibly a sign of food safety being restored, to some extent.
Fukushima Minpo
In the School Year 2015 (April 2015 through March 2016, in Japan), 27.3% of Fukushima’s school meal ingredients were produced in Fukushima, up from the year before by 5.4%. This is possibly a sign of food safety being restored, to some extent.

Worries still persist
As the chart in the article above shows, since shortly after the 2011 disaster, school meals in Fukushima Prefecture have gradually been using more farm products from the prefecture. Still, a certain mother of an elementary student, resident in Koriyama, has never bought any food produced in Fukushima since the 2011 disaster. She is even hesitant with foods from northern Kanto (just south of Fukushima). Though she lets her child eat school meals, it is simply because she cannot find a practical alternative. Today, five years after the meltdown began, this mother is still worried over food safety. She said she is determined to avoid made-in-Fukushima foods.

She is not alone
Here in Fukushima, countless mothers are worried about radiation, with no one to talk to about their worries. One way or another, a mother’s anxiety will inevitably affect her family and children. Using ingredients from Fukushima can show the world that the prefecture is rebuilding, yet the worries of countless mothers must not be ignored.

Fukushima Minpo has reported on many other troubles caused by the meltdown. Some couples broke up when the mother and her children evacuated alone. Some mothers received compensation for damages suffered, while some of their neighbors did not. Naturally, those neighbors express their anger at those who received compensation.

Professor Sung Won-Cheol of Chukyo University and his fellows have continuously conducted a survey, targeted at mothers having a child between 1 and 2 years of age, since shortly after the meltdown began. The survey covers 9 municipalities in Fukushima Prefecture, including Fukushima City.

In the 2015 survey, almost a half of the respondents, some 1,200 in number, said they were worried over their children (living in Fukushima). Some 30% of the respondents replied with either “Applies” or “Somehow applies” to the question, “Do you avoid foods produced in Fukushima Prefecture?” This ratio shows a sharp decline from the more than 80% who responded that way half a year after the 2011 disaster. About governmental compensation for damages, more than 70% replied that they have experienced some unfairness. Says Prof. Sung, “Everyone has his/her own response to radiation anxieties, and it is hard to counteract. There should at least be some measures to prevent the complaints of some victims from turning into insults directed at those who have received compensation.”

 

The Japanese author’s wish
Childhood experiences play a crucial role in the development of a child’s mind. In Fukushima and vicinity, radiation is badly affecting the childhoods of many children. Before it is too late, we need to restore an environment wherein parents can take care of their kids in peace.

 

 

 

 

The Year 5 Memorial Service of the 2011 Disaster was held at Southwark Cathedral, London, on February 6th, 2016

Original Japanese written by  staffer
The English below written and arranged by Heeday, based on the original Japanese
The English edited by Rev. Dr. Henry French, ELCA

Program book of the Year 5 Memorial Service of the 2011 Disaster
Program book of the Year 5 Memorial Service of the 2011 Disaster

The Year 5 Memorial Service of the 2011 Disaster of Eastern Japan was held 0n February 6th, 2016, at Southwark Cathedral, located close to London Bridge.

06022016_Memorial-054906022016_Memorial-0550(Photos by Shu Tomioka and Shin Adachi)

At the service, Kay Ikezumi, the secretary general of the Project on Nuclear Power and Radiation, was a guest speaker. She described how the areas and refugees hit hard by the 2011 meltdown of Fukushima Daiichi were presently doing.

A booth was set up within the cathedral where the Project presented what it is doing. Photos showed how many of those affected by the March 2011 disaster and volunteer helpers have befriended each other. Also, tea towels imprinted with the words “Let Us Walk Together” were displayed. The towels were also imprinted with comments by both those affected by the disaster and volunteers who help them.

This was the second memorial service held to remember the disaster. The first one was held in 2013. Five years after the tragedy, in Great Britain, far from the site of the disaster, many people came together for the memorial service to remember those affected by the disaster and their families. The service was proposed by both Britons and Japanese nationals living in the UK.

While Ms. Ai Ito, a soprano living in Paris, was singing, Bishop Michael Ipgrave began the memorial service.

Click here for the bishop’s homily ➡ Original / Japanese translation

After the homily, while the organist played a tune well-known to many Japanese called “Furusato (hometown)” on the pipe organ, all the participants tied a tag, in the shape of a cherry blossom, onto two trees beside the altar. This moving event was led by Mr. Motohiko Kato, the envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary at the Japanese embassy to the UK, and the Mayor of Southwark.

Trees of prayer

The cherry blossom tags were distributed to all the participants before the service began. Each tag carried the name of a place where the 2011 disaster had claimed one or more human lives. It was a seal of the promise to remember every life lost, his/her family, and every person who was affected by the tragedy and is still experiencing hardships.

The fully ornamented trees were illuminated to represent the hope of rebuilding those hard-hit areas.

The February 6th, 2016, edition of a British newspaper, “Church Times,” covered the service.
The February 6th, 2016, edition of a British newspaper, “Church Times,” covered the service.

Events around the worship
Before and after the service, meetings to report on the harm the Fukushima Daiichi meltdown had caused and what the Project was doing to counteract that harm gathered at several places.

At one of the these meetings, someone from a network named “JAN UK” greeted us. It is a network of individuals voicing their opposition to nuclear energy here in the UK, a country which still hosts nuclear power plants. Many of the network members are Japanese nationals.

To visit the website of JAN UK, click here ➡
To tweet, click here To tweet, click here ➡

Since August 2012, the network’s members have been gathering in front of the Japanese Embassy in the UK to protest against nuclear energy. Since October of the same year, they have been active before the London office of TEPCO as well.

JAN UK is a network rather than an organization. It has no representative. Under its banner, those concerned about nuclear power get together, as much as they can. One female participant said, “Doing nothing would be giving unspoken approval to nuclear power, which stands upon the sacrifices of many, as well as upon the socio-economic system that builds nuclear power plants. In serious agony, I am looking for what I can do to change all that.”

teatowl

Tea towel of wishes
These tea towels carry messages from both those involved in the Project and from people at “Support Center Shinchi Gangoya.”

It was Yuki Johnson, an Anglican currently living in the UK, who produced the tea towels. Her wish is that, five years following the 2011 disaster, Fukushima remain in people’s minds.

The towel sold for ₤4.5 apiece and, after deducting production costs, Yuki kindly donated the money raised to the Project .

 

The Japanese author’s wish
We are now witnessing the sad fact that the 2011 disaster and the consequences of the nuclear meltdown are gradually disappearing from the minds of many. Still, as shown above, our Project has been and still is supported by warm help from many concerned people. Our gratitude extends to all those who so generously help us.

 

 

Fukushima Daiichi’s “ice walls” are there, but the water-blocking walls are blocked from use

Original Japanese written by  staffer
The English below written and arranged by Heeday, based on the original Japanese
The English edited by Rev. Dr. Henry French, ELCA

Articles from the February 10th, 2016 editions of the Fukushima Minpo, Asahi Shimbun, and Akahata newspapers

▼Click each image to read an English summary of the Japanese article.

In its struggle to contain the contaminated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (NPP), TEPCO has resorted to building “ice walls*.” Presently, the walls are there, and yet the power company cannot start the final “freezing” of the walls. Japan’s Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) refuses to give the wall freezing a go-ahead, pointing out that rather than containing such water, as claimed by the power company, the water-shields could lead to further leakage of contaminated water. On February 9th, TEPCO announced the wall building work was done. Still, no one knows if the NRA will ever approve the walls for use.

(*) What are the “ice walls”?
At the Fukushima Daiichi NPP, under the reactor buildings where the melted nuclear fuel has fallen to the ground, underground water has been running into contact with the melted fuel, creating highly contaminated water. To counteract this, TEPCO announced a plan to surround the underground portions of reactors 1 through 4 with “ice walls,” 1,500m (0.93 mile) in total length. TEPCO installed numerous freezer pipes, 1,568 in number, 30m (33 yards) below the ground surface, with two pipes 1m (1.1 yard) apart from each other. The plan is to circulate a liquid coolant, 30C below the freezing point (22F below zero), through those pipes to freeze the soil surrounding the pipes. There is no precedence for such gigantic ice walls, however, and no evidence that the power company can maintain the frozen walls until 2020, as it claims to be able to do. Naturally, many are voicing their concerns over the ice wall plan. TEPCO is spending some JPY34.5 billion on the walls, which could well prove to be a huge extravagance.

What is wrong with the “ice walls”?
The Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) of Japan must give approval to the walls, yet the NRA has been doubtful about their effectiveness since the very beginning. If the underground water level goes below the ice walls, some of the highly contaminated water from the reactor buildings could leak into the soil outside the walls.

The NRA’s committee to determine whether or not the walls can function safely has asked the power company, over and over again, why it insists on the ice walls among so many other options. The committee’s chairperson, Mr. Shunichi Tanaka, even went on to say, “TEPCO’s grave error is that it is spreading the false belief that the ice walls, once built, can eliminate the whole issue of contaminated water,” in the spring of 2015.

Can be serious —
In fact, TEPCO held a trial freezing of the walls in 2015, and discovered the underground water level was lower than expected in some places. The levels differed from one location to another, and much remains unknown about the water flow rates and directions. Those walls, once frozen, take 2 months or so to melt. Thus, in case a problem is detected, no quick fix exists.

TEPCO vs NRA
The Fukushima Daiichi premises now hold more than 700,000 t (1,543,234 lb.) of processed yet still contaminated water, and it is hard to build more water tanks to accommodate it. Thus, TEPCO is insistent upon cutting down the volume of new contaminated water, while the NRA is determined to prevent any leakage of such water. In-spite-of these differences, wall building work was almost completed in December 2015, when the NRA made an exceptional written “suggestion” to TEPCO that they should “partially freeze” the ice walls to reduce the risk of some contaminated water leaking out of the reactor buildings. Still, the power company is determined to completely freeze the entire walls, although it is considering the NRA’s “suggestion.”

Decommissioning the Monju Fast Breeder Reactor (FBR) could cost some JPY300 billion — the Japan Atomic Energy Agency estimated in 2012

Original Japanese written by  staffer
The English below written and arranged by Heeday, based on the original Japanese
The English edited by Rev. Dr. Henry French, ELCA

Articles from the February 16th, 2016 editions of the Fukushima Minpo and the February 17th editions of the Fukushima Minpo and Akahata newspapers

▼Click each image to read an English summary of the Japanese article.

It has been learned that the Japan Atomic Energy Agency, the operator of the Monju FBR (Tsuruga, Fukui Pref., Japan, some 62 miles NNE of Kyoto), estimated that decommissioning the FBR could take some 30 years and some JPY300 billion.about  The Agency made the estimate in 2012, the year after the 2011 Fukushima meltdown. Said the Agency, “Back then there was a debate on whether or not to let Monju survive, so we made an internal estimate.”

Goliath can die, but —
This discovery, made public for the first time, about how much it could cost to decommission the FBR, makes clear that it will costeveral time more than decommissioning an average light water reactor. The non-operating breeder reactor has been a goliath money-eater, eating up more than JPY1 trillion with almost no power generated. Restarting it, instead of decommissioning it, could cost more than JPY100 billion for repairs, etc. Whether it is left alive or put to death, the goliath will remain a gigantic money-eater.

What is a FBR?
Monju is a fast breeder reactor, which runs on mixed oxide (MOX) fuel, a mixture of plutonium and uranium, and uses “fast” neutrons to cause nuclear fission. (Common light water reactors use slow neutrons.) A FBR generates more plutonium than it consumes for power generation, assuming there is power generation by the plant. Thus, it is called a “breeder.” Japan’s government, calling it the “dream reactor,” treated it as an indispensable component of the nation’s “nuclear fuel cycle,” which also requires a reprocessing plant for used nuclear fuels. Thus, the government has so far spent more than JPY1 trillion of tax money on FBR research and development. In spite of this megabuck spending, the FBR history has been a series of accidents and serious problems. Seldom has it produced any power. In 2012, it was discovered that an equipment checkup at Monju failed to cover many important items. The Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA,) in May 2013, gave an in-effect stoppage order to the FBR.

So, why has this money-eater been around so far?
The question should be, in fact, why have they not been able to decommission it? Japan already has more than 47 t (103,617 lb.) of plutonium, which can be used to produce several thousands of plutonium warheads. International society allows Japan to have the plutonium, on condition that Japan uses all of it for peaceful purposes—power generation at Monju, etc. Decommissioning Monju would, therefore, cause many in the outside world to suspect that Japan is building nuclear weapons.

They need a “lavatory”
Yet another reason is that the Japanese government wants to build a “lavatory” for used nuclear fuels. A FBR was intended to recycle used nuclear fuels. Now, after all those never-ceasing accidents and problems, the “lavatory” has proven to be non-existent. Still, if the government gave up on this nuclear fuel cycle, it would mean, in effect, that it is admitting that there is no nuclear fuel “lavatory.” Not just the government, but reactor builders and power companies who want to restart existing nuclear power plants want to keep alive the myth that a “lavatory” can be built.

The Japanese author’s wish
Letting Monju survive is obviously just putting off till tomorrow what we should be taking care of today. Japan’s government should not waste any more tax money on this fruitless FBR project. I hope they have the courage to decommission Monju as soon as possible.

Waste from decontamination has nowhere to go — only 1% of the needed land acquired so far for intermediate storages

Original Japanese written by  staffer
The English below written and arranged by Heeday, based on the original Japanese
The English edited by Rev. Dr. Henry French, ELCA

Articles from the February 13th and 17th, 2016 editions of the Fukushima Minpo and the February 14th edition of the Asahi Shimbun newspapers

▼Click each image to read an English summary of the Japanese article.

Much of the land desired for intermediate storage of radioactive waste from the meltdown of TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant (NPP), surrounds the NPP. This land is in the “no return zones,” where radioactivity is high and citizens are not permitted to enter without special permission. The Fukushima Prefectural Government, and the municipal governments of Okuma and Futaba towns, decided to store radioactive waste from the decontamination work almost a year ago. Japan’s Ministry of the Environment has been carrying out a pilot (trial) transfer of some radioactive waste into temporary storage facilities built on such land. The transfer should end sometime in March 2016.

Sounds fine so far, but —
The land acquisition negotiations for intermediate storage sites are in the doldrums. Currently, therefore, no one knows how soon the building of such storage facilities can begin, or when the full transfer of radioactive waste can begin. So far, after all those difficult negotiations, less than 1% of the needed land has been acquired. Yes, such storage sites are indispensable as Fukushima tries to rebuild itself. Still, the Ministry has a serious shortage of negotiators, while many land owners are reluctant to “give up the lands their ancestors have left for them.”

Where can it go?
At the same time, the Fukushima Prefectural Government says the existing temporary storage facilities are almost full. While the complete transfer of radioactive waste into intermediate storage has yet to begin, the decontamination work is still in progress, creating more and more waste. The obvious result is that heaps of collected radioactive waste are piled up close to houses and offices that have been “decontaminated.”

Part of our everyday life
I am a resident in Koriyama, Fukushima, and every day I see piles of waste along the streets. At many houses, waste from the decontamination of the house is simply buried under the garden. True, the decontamination reduced the radioactivity of the house a bit, but it is creepy to know that some radioactive waste lies beneath the yard. Living here means that you will never be free from radioactivity.

Collected radioactive soil, packed in vinyl bags and then in concrete pipes, are lined up just outside an apartment house in the neighborhood of our Project’s office.
Collected radioactive soil, packed in vinyl bags and then in concrete pipes, are lined up just outside an apartment house in the neighborhood of our Project’s office.
Workers digging a hole in a house yard to bury radioactive waste from decontamination.
Workers digging a hole in a house yard to bury radioactive waste from decontamination.

The Japanese author’s wish

To rebuild Fukushima, we have to decide soon where all the radioactive waste will go. No future generation should have to live among heaps of radioactive waste. I do wish for intermediate storage for all the hazardous waste as soon as possible so that our children and their children can live in safety. Yet at the same time, many land owners are reluctant to sell their land for intermediate storage sites, knowing their own life stories are in the land. This issue has no easy solution.